73
(c) where the use is insanitary.
It is also possible that
removal might be necessary on some ground not specified in
sub-section (3).
Accordingly, sub-sections (4) and (5)
give an absolute power of removal.
23.
There are other minor alterations:
24.
(a) In section 162 of the principal Ordinance it
was only construction that was an offence.
The new section makes maintenance also an
offence.
That necessitates the distinction
drawn in sub-sections (1) and (2) between
construction before the commencement of the
amending Ordinance and construction after that
date.
(b) The old section 162 applied only where there
was connection with a sewer or drain. The
new section will take effect in cases where
the discharge is into a sump.
(c) Provision is made in sub-section (8) for re-
covering the cost of removal where it has to
be done by the Building Authority.
In my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His
Excellency the Governor may properly assent inthe
His Majesty and on His behalf.
name of
Attorney
General.
Page 70Page 71
No 165(b).
Sanction
191-
4 JUL 1927
Sir,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.